Many higher education institutions want to give students optimal flexibility with their courses and learning. But there’s a trade-off: when students can complete the curriculum in any order, essential skills are often presumed to be learned somewhere along the way, rather than intentionally integrated and reinforced throughout. The curriculum – and overall programme goals – might look great on paper but without clear articulation of where different skills should be introduced, reinforced and assessed, students can reach advanced courses without the preparation those courses assume.
At my institution, this became clear in a capstone course I was teaching. Students were expected to demonstrate mastery of our programme’s “executive-ready communications” goal at the end of an eight-week course, which also marked the culmination of their programme. But for many, the capstone was also the first place they were exposed to formal executive communications instruction. This made what should have been an opportunity for reinforcement and mastery into a high-stakes crash course.
In this case, we offered flexibility without a coordinated system for how learning outcomes appear across the curriculum. Without these guidelines, we inadvertently shifted the responsibility onto students to ensure they were progressing appropriately.
As students move through a curriculum, leaders need to think not only about the goals of the programme holistically but about critical learning milestones. Curriculum mapping requires intentional design for the best student outcomes.
Create programme goals
Curriculum mapping should start with institutional goals, not individual courses. Intentionally mapping out learning progression does not mean you need to prescribe the order of classes for a programme. Instead, consider your institution’s value proposition; identify what you already do well and translate that into programme goals. For example, my university has a renowned writing programme, and our business college has leaned into this by focusing on executive-ready communications as one of our programme goals. With broader goals like this at the core of curriculum mapping, you develop coherence across courses that can strengthen programmes.
Break down programme goals into learning milestones and sequence across the curriculum. After you have determined your goals, you need to move from big, abstract ideas to concrete steps. You have already identified your student outcomes; the learning milestones will help to get them there. Consider which courses offer:
- Early exposure and introduction to goals
- Reinforcement of goals
- Final demonstration and mastery of goals.
This intentional scaffolding helps avoid issues like the one we ran into with our capstone course, with ideas being introduced at the same time mastery was expected. Integrating learning milestones into courses allows the responsibility to be distributed across the curriculum and ensures flexibility for students and faculty.
- Spotlight guide: Soft skills for hard times
- A university educators’ guide to universal design for learning
- Tips for co-creating education projects
The role of rubrics
Use marking rubrics as infrastructure. Shared rubrics create shared expectations across courses and enable programme-level assessments. They also make learning visible to students. Additionally, using consistent shared rubrics allows for course adjustments while maintaining the sequence of learning milestones. Faculty can modify as appropriate but still have programme goals to follow.
A master curriculum map does not come together all at once. We started by creating a rubric for just one programme goal and then staggered remaining mapping work to align with our existing three-year review timelines.
Bring others on board
Engage faculty early on for buy-in and best results. Standardised goals and learning milestones do not have to eliminate academic freedom. Rather than issuing mandates for course redesigns and rubric creation, we approached curriculum mapping as collaborative, compensated work. Buy-in is built through participation and trust: invite both passionate and sceptical faculty for co-creation. Ownership of the project, along with a stipend for the extra work, can help reduce resistance to structural changes and truly improves the quality of the outputs.
How AI can help with curriculum mapping
Consider AI a tool, not a replacement for academic decision-making or leadership. Effective curriculum map creation is an in-depth, involved process – it takes time. But, for institutions that have already done the work of creating programme goals and learning milestones, AI can be a time-saving tool. We have already started to refine our programme goals and identify core skills; now we plan to use AI to connect to our learning platform to map course content, assignments and syllabi to these learning objectives. We will have a robust map of where skills such as critical thinking are introduced, reinforced and assessed in our programme. AI cannot replace human judgment but it can quickly surface patterns and insights to help with decision-making.
Curriculum mapping is not simply a one-time administrative project or bureaucratic task; it is an ongoing leadership responsibility. By starting with purpose, sequencing learning intentionally, engaging faculty as partners and using AI strategically, we allow students to progress in a way that enables them to maintain flexibility and successfully master skills.
Erin Nelson is associate dean for graduate professional programs and associate professor of practice at Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa.
If you found this interesting and want advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week, sign up for the THE Campus newsletter.
comment